Programme

Implant safety

Optical implants are medical devices that update their own software. When one harms someone, the harm should be written down somewhere independent of the company that made it. That is what the Register is for.

Since
2016, at the Chiba Centre for Visual Science
What it records
Harm, faults and near misses from optical implants of every make, reported by wearers, clinicians and makers
Makers covered
Nine, including Kiroshi Opticals and three that no longer exist
Aftercare clinics
Fourteen, in Japan, Kenya, the Philippines and the United States, free to wearers of any make
FY2025 spending
¥2.66 billion (about US$17.5 million), 11% of charitable spending
Registrar
Dr Ines Halvorsen, Chiba. Reports to the board’s Audit and Risk Committee
The work

The Independent Implant Register

Anyone can report to the Register: a wearer whose implant has started to show them things that are not there, a surgeon who has removed a device that overheated, a maker that has found a fault in its own firmware. Reports are made online, by post or through any of our aftercare clinics, in Japanese, English or any language a clinic can translate. Each is read by a clinician within two working days.

The Register looks for patterns: several reports of the same fault, a rise after a firmware update, a problem that affects one batch of devices. When it finds one, which it calls a signal, it tells the maker, the regulators in every country where the device is sold and the public, at the same time and in the same words. Makers are not told first.

Fig. 6. Reports to the Register by month, FY2025 A bar chart of reports each month from April 2025 to March 2026, rising from 1,984 in April to 2,756 in March, 27,416 in all. The serious harm reports in each month are shown as a darker band at the base of each bar, drawn at four times scale: between 139 and 177 a month. A note marks November, when the Register issued its signal on a battery fault in one production run of a consumer implant. 01,0002,0003,000 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Signal S-2025-15: battery fault All reports Serious harm (shown at 4× scale)
Fig. 6Reports to the Register each month in FY2025. Serious harm is drawn at four times its scale so that it can be seen.

Because the Foundation owns a large part of one implant maker, the Register is built to be independent of the Foundation as well. The Registrar reports to the board’s Audit and Risk Committee, from which the directors nominated by Kiroshi Opticals are excluded. Its funding is set three years at a time and cannot be reduced in the middle of a term. Its annual report is published without review by anyone outside the Register.

Aftercare clinics

Fourteen clinics, run by partner hospitals, offer free check-ups, cleaning, battery and firmware checks for wearers of any make of optical implant, and report what they find to the Register. For many wearers they are the only place an implant can be looked at by someone who is not selling a replacement. In FY2025 they saw 61,880 visits.

Outcomes

Outcomes

The Register counts what is reported to it, which is not the same as all the harm there is. We say so, and we estimate the difference.

Reports in FY2025 by maker, against each maker’s share of implants worn
  • Kiroshi Opticals: reports61%
  • Kiroshi Opticals: implants worn58%
  • Other makers: reports39%
  • Other makers: implants worn42%
Reports to the Independent Implant Register, FY2021 to FY2025
YearReportsSerious harmSignals issuedMedian days to signal
FY202115,0201,106731
FY202217,3881,290927
FY202320,1451,5121222
FY202423,8701,7171120
FY202527,4161,9031419

Serious harm: death, permanent loss of sight or other function, surgery to remove or replace the device, or a hospital stay. Signal: a pattern of reports judged by the Register’s clinical panel to show a likely fault, published with a notice to makers and regulators. Days to signal: from the first report in the pattern to publication.

More reports do not necessarily mean more harm. Reporting has risen as more people wear implants and as the clinics have made reporting easier. The Register estimates that it receives reports of between a quarter and a half of all serious harm in the countries it covers.

The Register’s own annual reports count by calendar year, so their totals differ from these.

Source: Independent Implant Register.

How we measure outcomes, and the full dataset

Conflicts
Grants and stories

Recent grants

Recent grants in this programme
GrantGranteeAmountAwarded
KF-2026-0121 Diagnostic readers and staff training for the aftercare clinic in NairobiNairobi Implant Aftercare Clinic
Kenya
¥157 million27 October 2026
KF-2026-0105 Reporting implant harm to the Register from Los Angeles (second phase)Los Angeles Implant Aftercare Clinic
United States
¥12.1 million13 September 2026
KF-2026-0092 Opening an aftercare clinic for wearers of any make of implant in Cebu (continuation)Cebu Island Vision Partnership aftercare clinic
Philippines
¥135 million9 August 2026
KF-2026-0016 Free aftercare for wearers of any make of implant in Sapporo (second phase)Sapporo Implant Aftercare Clinic
Japan
¥126 million18 April 2026
KF-2025-0425 Free aftercare for wearers of any make of implant in Mombasa (second phase)Coast Implant Clinic
Kenya
¥39.4 million27 February 2026
KF-2025-0417 Diagnostic readers and staff training for the aftercare clinic in MombasaCoast Implant Clinic
Kenya
¥65.6 million20 February 2026

All 72 grants in this programme

Stories

Programme lead: Dr Ines Halvorsen, Chiba. Questions about this programme: programmes@kiroshi.org.