Research

Research and open standards

The Chiba Centre for Visual Science studies how people see, and how devices see on their behalf. It runs the Independent Implant Register, holds the Shared Sight data, and writes the open standards that let any implant be serviced by anyone.

Chiba Centre

The Centre opened in 2016 in Makuhari, Chiba, a short walk from the bay. It has 61 staff: vision scientists, clinicians, engineers, data stewards and the staff of the Register. It does its own research and funds research elsewhere through the Foundation’s open calls.

Its work falls under three headings: how people with low vision see and how to help them; how the perception software in implants and assistive devices behaves, and how it fails; and how implants should be built so that the people who wear them are not dependent on any one company.

Head
Dr Tachibana Shion
Staff
61
FY2025 spending
¥4.87 billion, including research grants
Research partner
Frothly, since 2021
Address
2-11 Utase, Mihama-ku, Chiba 261-0013
Publications

Publications and datasets

  • KF-R-2026-02 Annual report · March 2026

    Independent Implant Register: annual report for 2025

    Reports, signals and serious harm from optical implants of every make in calendar year 2025, with the Register’s estimate of under-reporting and an updated analysis of harm from discontinued devices.

  • KF-R-2025-06 Report · December 2025

    Bystanders: what optical implants see of other people

    With Oxenfurt University. A survey of what nine implant models record, process and keep about the people their wearers look at, and of the law on it in thirteen countries. The basis for the 2026 revision of KF-OS 2.

  • KF-WP-2025-04 Working paper · September 2025

    Lost to follow-up: tracing cataract patients who did not come back

    Programme quality team. A pilot in two hospitals in FY2024: of 386 patients traced at home in western Kenya and Nepal after missing follow-up, 68.4% had a good outcome, against 77.6% of those who returned. The method the Foundation adopted across sight restoration in FY2025.

  • KF-R-2025-03 Audit · August 2025

    Shared Sight: independent audit of anonymisation

    An external audit of how Shared Sight removes donors’ identities and blurs other people. It found the method works as described, and made seven recommendations.

  • KF-D-2025-01 Dataset · March 2025

    KF-LV 1.0: a low-vision test set for perception models

    With Frothly’s Blackwall programme. 27,500 annotated scenes recorded at eye height in poor light, on stairs, at crossings and in crowds, for testing whether the perception software in assistive devices fails in the places that matter most to blind and partially sighted people.

  • KF-R-2024-01 Report · June 2024

    The support gap: discontinued medical implants in six countries

    What happens to people when the maker of their implant stops supporting it. Case studies of four device families, with recommendations for makers, regulators and hospitals.

  • KF-R-2023-02 Report · November 2023

    Who checks the eye? Independent oversight of optical implants

    The final report of the scoping study with Frothly. It recommended independent pre-release evaluation of perception software, firmware escrow for discontinued devices and wider adoption of open service interfaces, and that the Independent Implant Register, which predates the study, be given funding that cannot be cut mid-term. The Foundation has since acted on each.

Publications are free. For a PDF of any of them, or the KF-LV dataset, write to research@kiroshi.org; datasets are released under a data use agreement that forbids re-identifying anyone.

Independent studies

Independent studies of our work

Studies by researchers we did not fund and could not influence, which tested whether our programmes do what we say. We list every one we know of, including those that found us wanting.

  • Peer-reviewed study · 2026

    Displacement in donor-funded cataract surgery: evidence from western Kenya

    Compared operations funded by the Foundation in Siaya and Homa Bay counties with public surgical lists before and after the grant. About one in six funded operations would have happened within a year through public provision. The authors found no effect on outcomes.

    Ochieng, P. and Varela, T. (2026). Health Systems in Africa, 4(1), 22–40.

  • Peer-reviewed study · 2025

    Would they have got them anyway? A counterfactual study of school spectacle provision in Nepal

    Followed children in Mieru and comparison schools in three districts for two years. About a third of children given spectacles by Mieru would have obtained them within two years without it, mostly through private opticians in towns. The effect on children in rural schools was larger than average.

    Bhattarai, S., Khadka, R. and Lindqvist, M. (2025). Journal of Global Eye Health, 9(2), 114–131.

  • Evaluation · 2023

    The Independent Implant Register: an external review of its first seven years

    Found that the Register’s signals were timely and its clinical review sound, but that reporting by wearers in the Philippines and Kenya lagged far behind Japan. Recommended aftercare clinics as reporting points, which the Foundation has since adopted.

    Commissioned by the board’s Audit and Risk Committee from an independent review team; published in full with the Register’s 2022 annual report.

Standards

Open standards

Three standards, free to implement by anyone, written in public with comments from wearers, clinicians and makers.

Kiroshi Foundation open standards
StandardTitleVersionStatusImplemented by
KF-OS 1Implant service interface2.1Published
3 July 2023
6 of 9 makers
KF-OS 2Bystander privacy for optical implants1.0Published
24 September 2024
4 of 9 makers
KF-OS 3Private provenance for ocular captureDraft 0.4Open for comment until 15 January 2027
14 October 2026
Not yet applicable

About the standards and how they are made

Partners

Working with Frothly

Since 2021 the Centre has been a research partner of Frothly, the independent institute that runs the Turing Registry. Together we built KF-LV, the low-vision test set that Blackwall now uses to evaluate perception models in medical implants, and since 2024 Frothly’s Lazarus archive has preserved the firmware of implants their makers no longer support. Frothly’s research on the faithfulness of explanations from vision systems and on provenance for images shaped KF-OS 2 and KF-OS 3.

The partnership, in full

At home

Mieru at home

The Centre maintains the Landolt chart Mieru uses in schools, and a version you can use at home on a screen or printed. It will not replace an eye test, but it will tell you whether you should have one. Try Mieru at home.